Originally published in the South China Morning Post by Peta Tomlinson on 21 October 2018.

Designed to absorb 25 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year and produce about 60kg of oxygen per day, the vertical forest being planted in Nanjing, eastern China, is a move against nature-deprived urban development.

It might seem like blue-sky dreaming to imagine a Chinese city where you cannot see the buildings for the trees. But Italian architect Stefano Boeri can see it, and is crafting its beginnings in Nanjing, which he says will be home to the first vertical forest in China and Asia.

A move against nature-deprived urban development, vertical forests differ from the green walls and roof gardens popularised in recent times because they grow trees as opposed to vines or small potted plants.

A vertical forest is “a model for a sustainable residential building” that could actually be a solution to climate change, Boeri believes.
He first realised his concept of metropolitan reforestation with a vertical forest in Milan. Spread across two residential towers, the project, completed in 2014, featured 800 trees (each measuring three, six or nine metres tall), 4,500 shrubs and 15,000 plants.

His Nanjing Green Towers project, in China’s eastern Jiangsu province, will be bigger. It will again be based on two residential towers, but they will be higher than the ones in Milan (at 200 metres and 108 metres) and the plantings will include 1,100 trees along with 2,500 cascading plants and shrubs. The trees will come from 23 local species including holm oak, wild pear, koelreuteria, ornamental apple tree and hawthorn.


When such ambitious green buildings started springing up, not everyone was convinced of the advantages. Appropriately detailed vertical gardens are expensive to construct and require a large amount of maintenance, says Richard Kirk, former president of the Australian Institute of Architects. In a hot and dry climate such as Australia’s, he adds, they consume a lot of water, which affects the robustness of a vertical garden over the long term.

That is not a problem for the 23 green walls of One Central Park, a mixed-use building in Sydney.

One Central Park

One Central Park, Sydney

It is now five years since its 2013 completion which saw it become, at the time, the building with the largest planting coverage in the world. The plantings continue to thrive, sustained by an on-site recycling plant that collects rain and grey water and produces about one million litres of reusable water a day.

About 65,000 litres (6 per cent) of this irrigates the green walls, while the rest is used elsewhere in the complex and also irrigates parks and gardens around the 58,000 square metre (625,000 square foot) Central Park precinct in which it is situated.

Mark Giles, senior associate at Australian firm PTW Architects – the local collaborating firm on One Central Park – says the project helped establish the idea of green walls globally.

The system of plants, designed by French botanist Patrick Blanc, was installed and is maintained by local company Junglefy. More than 250,000 plants of 300 different species live on the building’s various exteriors, in 5.5 kilometres of planter boxes.

Although the weight of these vertical gardens is not a significant issue, Giles says, robust waterproofing is required to prevent leaks and ultraviolet degradation.
“One Central Park shows that you can incorporate this technology, working with a developer who has their commercial objectives, and achieve an outcome that gives longevity and purpose to buildings,” he says.

Giles says this approach shows that dense cities can also be sustainable. “The green walls and plantings of One Central Park are all part of the message about how we can create density with responsibility in our cities,” he says.

image One Central Park Green Facade

One Central Park, Sydney

Jock Gammon, who co-founded Junglefy with his wife Hanna in 2009, says much can be learned from One Central Park about how to bring plants to cities.

“In the past, ‘living infrastructure’ [including vertical gardens] was about aesthetics. Now it’s become more functional, cleaning the air and introducing biodiversity,” he says. He adds that foliage combined with shade provided by cantilevered planter boxes can substantially reduce heat load on a building – as is the case at One Central Park.

Some adjustments to the plantings have been required, however, since the building opened. “The green walls were the trickiest,” Gammon says. Some species specified by Blanc did not do well in Australian conditions, while others grew too fast, demanding extra maintenance. “We have now refined the palette and also manage the irrigation and fertilising system to control the plant growth.”

Despite the need for continuous care, Gammon believes that plants are as critical a piece of urban infrastructure as roads, water and electricity. “There’s no doubt they make our cities more liveable. Developers know people want these types of buildings – they’re not a fad,” he says. “[But] you can easily cut corners on these projects and build them cheaply [and that’s when they fail].”

The next advancement may be green walls that actively clean the air. The Junglefy Breathing Wall (patent pending) is a plant and ventilation system that draws in polluted air to be filtered and cooled by plant modules, reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air by 24.2 litres per hour.

“This is where we see the future,” Gammon says. “Engineers can start to use greenery in their calculations of building performance and that really changes the whole landscape about why you’re putting greenery in cities, and what benefits it can bring.”

This article continues – read the full article at South China Morning Post